PowerOutrage

OutRaged about Unneeded Power Supply Expansion

Archive for May, 2006

Daily News Journal-TVA should consider old battery factory site

Posted by bdy73 on May 22, 2006

The Daily News Journal
Originally published 5/22/2006

TVA should consider old battery factory site

To the editor,

I don’t believe that TVA looked very hard for other sites for their substation. There is an old site off of U.S. Highway 31 Alt between Kirkland and College Grove that was once a battery reclaiming factory (General Smelting) that has been closed for several years that TVA could buy, and it would not be taking good farm land and people’s livelihood away.

Well, I guess they didn’t consider this site because it is in Williamson County! Maybe someone at The Daily News Journal would inform these people about this site and ask why they haven’t looked at it. This would put land to use that can’t be otherwise used and it isn’t but a few miles to state Route 840.

Charles Holden
North Cove

Posted in Daily News Journal, TVA | Leave a Comment »

The Energy Efficiency Potential in Williamson County, Tennessee

Posted by bdy73 on May 14, 2006

This is an independent study commissioned by the Harpeth River Watershed Association and the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy in 2002. The study concludes that energy conservation measures could reduce overall power consumption in Williamson County by between 13% and 23% and reduce the annual rate of load growth from 3.5% to between 0.8% to 1.6%.TVA still hasn’t heard this message. Make your voice heard!
Click here to read the study

Posted in Conservation, Opinion, TVA | Leave a Comment »

The Daily News Journal-Health concerns a factor in resisting TVA substation

Posted by bdy73 on May 14, 2006

The Daily News Journal
Originally published May 14, 2006

Health concerns a factor in resisting TVA substation
Leukemia among possible issues with electric magnetic fields
By MARY REEVES
Gannett/Tennessee

While many Eagleville residents are concerned about the loss of prime farmland or their homes, there are other concerns associated with the potential 500-kilovolt substation TVA plans to build there, especially health concerns.

“Some of the literature … pointed out that there is an increase in leukemia with power lines,” said Lisa Matson of Rockvale. “There is a link between cancer and electromagnetic fields, and my concern is they are going to put this directly behind the school.”

Electric and magnetic fields are generated by all sorts of power sources, from nature’s thunderstorms to the office photocopier. With man-made power sources, the electrical fields result from the energizing of the wiring, and the magnetic fields result from the flow of power (current) as it serves the load being applied. “EMF” refers to electric and magnetic fields and “ELF” refers to extremely low frequency, the sort found in the transmission power lines.

Since America’s use of power surged in the late 1950s, studies have been done on the effects of high voltage lines on the environment, but other than accidental electrocutions, it appears the magnetic fields may be the culprit of the health concerns.

“Although a cause-and-effect relationship has not been established, several expert panels have concluded that higher rates of childhood leukemia are statistically associated with higher levels of magnetic fields in homes,” stated a report of the Electric Power Research Institute, which is conducting long-term multidisciplinary EMF research through major universities, laboratories and consulting organizations.

Matson, like many concerned with the proposed substation, had found information about the possible links between childhood leukemia and magnetic fields at www.poweroutrage.com, a Web site devoted to fighting the TVA plan.

Findings of the EMF RAPID Program (Electric and Magnetic Fields Research and Public Information Dissemination) completed in 1998 agree that there seems to be a link between proximity to EMF and increased rates of childhood leukemia, and, in adults who work in the electric industry, increased rate of adult CLL (chronic lymphocytic leukemia), which is a different disease.

The EMF RAPID program was conducted by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy. Although it was primarily funded by the government to comply with the Energy Policy Act, it was also funded by utility companies.

The Executive Summary of the EMF RAPID report stated : “The scientific evidence suggesting that ELF-EMF exposures pose any health risk is weak. The strongest evidence for health effects comes from associations observed in human populations with two forms of cancer: childhood leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in occupationally exposed adults.”

The problem was, the evidence was epidemiological — that is, it showed an association between magnetic fields and in increase in incidents, but no cause-and-effect relationship could be recreated in the laboratory.

The RAPID report also indicated that “interface from EMF can affect various medical devices, including cardiac pacemakers and implantable defibrillators.”

In the summary, the working group of scientists and other experts concluded that “ELF EMF are possibly carcinogenic to humans.”

The report stated there was “inadequate evidence” that EMF ELF caused Alzheimer’s, ALS, breast cancer, suicide and depression, adverse effects on pregnancies and other health concerns. The study did find, however, that “exposure to electric and magnetic fields affects bone repair and adaptation.”

Power substations and powerlines are not the only source for ELF EMF, however. According to lessemf.com, “2.5 mG is the generally accepted limit of ELF magnetic field exposure, but no one tells you that the average hair dryer, vacuum cleaner, or can opener you use emits and amazing 300 mG or more.”

Another concern, one voiced the Vaughn family in Eagleville, who produce organically grown animals and crops for human consumption, was the effect the ELF EMF may have on their produce, and on those who consume the produce.

“Nobody’s ever really said anything about that,” said Pettus Read with the Tennessee Farm Bureau about the effect on plants. “We’ve had soybean fields and such under these powerlines. We’ve never had any complaints.”

Read said he didn’t believe the amount of ELF EMF created at that level would have an adverse affect on the plants, but said he did not know for sure and was not aware of any studies.

“The biggest complaint we’ve had is losing the farm land,” he added.

Roger Sparry, TVA manager of siting and environmental engineer, said that while there has been some epidemiological evidence between the possibility to ELF EMF and some cancers, he, too, had heard of no negative effects on plants.

“I’ve never heard of any reports of it directly affecting plants,” he said.

Posted in Daily News Journal, TVA | Leave a Comment »

The Daily News Journal-TVA: Power lines could overload by 2011

Posted by bdy73 on May 14, 2006

The Daily News Journal
Originally published May 14, 2006

TVA: Power lines could overload by 2011
BY MARY REEVES
Gannett/Tennessee

Rapid growth in Rutherford County is not only placing a strain on the highway and schools – it’s draining the power lines as well.

By 2011, TVA estimates many of the transmission lines serving Rutherford and Williamson counties will be overloaded. In order to have additional power sources ready for the influx of customers by that time, TVA has plans to start building a new substation now – in Rutherford County.

Rutherford and neighboring Williamson are two of the state’s fastest-growing counties. Since 1990, their combined population has grown by approximately 46 percent, U.S. Census figures show. With residential construction booming, the demand for power has increased an average of 3.5 percent annually, TVA says.

Since last summer, three alternatives have been considered, including upgrading the Pinhook substation, located between La Vergne and Nashville; building a new substation in the Brentwood area; or building a station in Rutherford County, in the Eagleville area to better access existing rights of way for both Rutherford and Williamson County transmission lines.

Now the opinions have been narrowed to Rutherford.

“It was a combinations of reasons, ” said Charles Nicholson, TVA environmentalist, referring to the decision to drop the Pinhook and Brentwood alternatives. “We would have to take many transmission lines out of service and rebuild them. Because of the need to keep electrical service going to the areas, there were a limited number of lines we could take out of service at one time. There were also foundation issues at Pinhook and residential issues at Brentwood.”

Dense population surrounded the site in Brentwood, he said, and the rock outcroppings at both sites would call for a lot of blasting. Also, because there would not be the issue of interrupting service, the work would be done faster in Rutherford County, he said, and would have a better chance of meeting the 2010 deadline.

“Cost was a factor … in separating the Rutherford from the Brentwood and the Pinhook sites,” said Nicholson. Although the Rutherford County site is estimated to cost more in capital outlay – 8 percent more than the Brentwood site and 3 percent more than the Pinhook site, the overall project cost would be $3 million less than Brentwood and $20 million less than Pinhook.

Julie Vaughn, whose family farm is one of the sites being considered, is torn. While she recognizes the need for more power, she also agonizes over the possibility of losing more than 60 acres of prime farmland – and the family livelihood.

“We do understand that there is a need for the increased power because we have seen the growth in both Rutherford and Williamson County,” she said. “Our suggestion is to use the existing right of way or use an abandoned industrial site, like the battery plant out by Kirkland. We don’t know if they’ve investigated using commercial property. We would just as soon they take another look and re-evaluate.”

Two of the things she would like to see TVA engineers re-evaluate are the other sites.
“(Pinhook) is already there, and the power lines are already run – you wouldn’t be interrupting about 300 people’s property rights,” Vaughn said.

When scouting for a new station site, Nicholson said a variety of conditions are studied.

“There’s a combination of a lot of different properties,” he said. “The foundation conditions, bedrock, soil conditions, how close it is to road systems, other transmission lines, the amount of development in the area, other houses in the area, as well as a whole range of other environmental factors, wetlands and rare species.”

Nicholson said a wetlands survey had not been done of the areas being considered yet.

On the TVA Web site, visitors can find the Rutherford-Williamson-Davidson Power Supply Improvement Project Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Document, which details each site and the reasons given for choosing, or not choosing, each of them.

It also includes environmental issues to be addressed in the study: Water quality and quantity for both surface water and groundwater; vegetation; wildlife, including habitat fragmentation; aquatic ecology; endangered and threatened species and their critical habitats; wetlands; managed areas and ecologically significant sites; recreation; visual resources; flood plains; land use – including prime farmland; archaeological and historic resources; and socioeconomics, including property values and environmental justice.

Undeveloped land is another factor TVA looks for.

“In this context, yes, we would consider farmland as ‘undeveloped,’” said Nicholson. “‘Developed’ would be houses and commercial developments.”

The proposed 500-kilovolt substation will require about 60 acres that TVA would purchase from the landowner, as well as rights of way for the transmission towers and lines. Although TVA already has several rights of way in the area, it would need more.

“We are going to have to purchase some rights of way. We buy an easement that gives us the right to build and maintain the transmission line, it also restricts the property. We would purchase land for station,” Nicholson said, adding that it would be at fair market value. Using eminent domain would, he said, “only be as a last resort. We try to work with the landowners as much as possible.”

“Where they are wanting to take it, they would need to purchase the entire farm, not just the 60 acres,” said Vaughn. “They are going to leave us with a border that is basically useless.”

The Patterson site being considered is about 310 acres along Patterson Road, about two miles east of Highway 41A/31A, and would be able to access the currently vacant Hartsville-Maury transmission line right of way, as well as the Murfreesboro-Triune-East Franklin transmission line.

The second potential site in Rutherford County is in a 750-acre area on Rocky Glade Road, about two miles northeast of Eagleville, and is also close to existing transmission lines or rights of way. The Maury right of way was purchased in the 1970s to construct the Hartsville-Maury transmission line that was never completed. Although most of it was never cleared, TVA has maintained ownership.

Additional lines would be necessary, but Nicholson said TVA tries to place them carefully.

“We would not build it over a school building, and we would try to keep it as far from school property as possible,” he said.

The lines from the substation would be transmission lines, high voltage power lines moving the electricity elsewhere, as compared to the distribution power lines that bring electricity to the home. Those owners with TVA right of way easements on their property – which should be detailed in the deed – have to follow a set of guidelines about the easement, including no buildings or tall trees near the towers or lines.

There is opposition to the proposed substation, especially among the 300 or so Eagleville residents whose property – and property values – will be affected. There was similar opposition to the Brentwood site, but Nicholson said the public outcry was not the reason the site was eliminated as a prospect.

“Public opinion is something we consider, but there were other factors involved,” he said. “We hope the local residents will accept it wherever we put it, but we know that’s not always the case.”

Posted in Daily News Journal, TVA | Leave a Comment »

The Daily News Journal-TVA substation would destroy families’ lives

Posted by bdy73 on May 14, 2006

The Daily News Journal
Originally published May 14, 2006

TVA substation would destroy families’ lives

To the editor,
I was appalled to see that TVA is thinking of putting a substation on farmland that has been in families for up to four generations.

What could they possibly be thinking? Why not use some old commercial property that has not seen any activity in years?

These are families’ homes and livelihood. It’s a shame that good people have to suffer for mass energy.

And the way TVA goes about it is just disheartening. Shame on them. How would they like it if their family home and property was taken over in such a manner? I’m sure they wouldn’t like it one bit.

Stephanie Robbins
West College Street

Posted in Daily News Journal, TVA | Leave a Comment »

The Daily News Journal-TVA should seek substation options with less impact

Posted by bdy73 on May 14, 2006

The Daily News Journal
Originally published May 14, 2006

TVA should seeksubstation options with less impact

More than 1,200 people signed a petition opposing TVA’s two proposed sites for a 500-kilovolt substation near Eagleville and the Patterson community in southwest Rutherford County.

It’s a message the Tennessee Valley Authority should hear loud and clear.

Residents of this area, and many in neighboring Williamson County, learned about TVA’s plan April 11 and had only 30 days to respond. Yet they gathered 1,200 signatures opposing the plan, which would require 50 acres for the substation and hundreds more for transmission lines through the rural area. They turned in the petition Thursday.

For their part, TVA officials say without a new substation, Rutherford and Williamson counties would suffer an electricity shortage by 2010.

Nobody is opposed to electricity, the extension of lines or a substation — just location.

TVA’s plan would destroy the lives of numerous families in the area, where the rural way of life is highly valued.

Concerns abound about health, land values and the environment, and the plan could force some residents to sell their land or businesses, the petition claims.

Relatives of Pauline Arnold have lived in the Patterson community south of state Route 96 West (Franklin Road) since 1932. She grew up there. She and her husband want to retire there, where they have deer and turkeys scampering across their yard every evening.

U.S. Rep. Bart Gordon, D-Murfreesboro, believes residents are receiving a tough deal from TVA. He wants the utility to look for alternatives.

TVA has pointed to cost concerns in building elsewhere, but some ideals rise above dollars and cents.

Farmland is disappearing fast. Once it’s gone, then what? Are we willing to give up our green space without investigating every alternative for a new power station?

We’re not, and neither are the residents of southwestern Rutherford County.

TVA announced Thursday it would extend the public comment period on the plan so more residents can weigh in.

This shouldn’t be window-dressing. TVA should seriously consider the property owner complaints, seek alternatives and offer a Plan B.

Power is a necessity, but not at the cost of ruining people’s lives.

Posted in Daily News Journal, TVA | Leave a Comment »

The Daily News Journal-Residents hope petitions will zap TVA proposal

Posted by bdy73 on May 12, 2006

The Daily News Journal
Originally published May 12, 2006

Residents hope petitions will zap TVA proposal
By BYRON HENSLEY
hensley@dnj.com

More than 1,200 people opposing plans for a new 500-kilovolt power station and transmission lines in rural Rutherford and Williamson counties delivered petitions to the Murfreesboro TVA office Thursday.

Some 25-30 people were on hand when the petitions were delivered, including Dana Reed of the Patterson community in Rutherford County, a possible substation site.

“We would lose roughly 20 acres and our hay barn,” she said. “We raise horses and sell babies, so it will put us out of business.”

With population growing in Rutherford and Williamson at an average rate of 4.3 percent per year since 1990, electric power demand has grown by 3.5 percent per year in that time. TVA predicts that by 2010, load growth will be more than its current transmission system will be able to handle.

But residents of the communities where potential sites for the new substation and transmission lines are located don’t think they can handle a 40-60 acre substation in their neighborhoods. They fear it would harm communities, the environment and property values.

“This will be a monstrosity going through some totally beautiful country,” potential power line neighbor Linda Soderquist said. “It’s the last thing we want to look at.”

Rockvale area resident Brenda Kiskis-Elliott, who lives two houses away from where a transmission line would go under one proposal, said she hopes TVA will instead upgrade existing facilities to meet the growing demand.

“You can’t replace the memories,” she said. “You can’t replace everything everybody has done with their homes.”

Kiskis-Elliott said TVA may have been under the impression that the community was undeveloped in making its proposal.

“It’s not undeveloped,” she said. “It’s developed exactly how we want it.”

“That is undoubtedly some of the most beautiful land in Tennessee,” said Kelly Schaffer of Christiana, who likes riding horses in the Patterson area.

“We’ve ridden out there for years,” she said. “I would be devastated if I didn’t have access to those beautiful, rolling hills”

Horse farmer Suzane Wooten doesn’t accept explanations by TVA officials that the Eagleville and Patterson locations are necessary because alternatives could not be completed by 2010.

“That seems like bad planning,” Wooten said. “They are asking people who have lived here for 30 years or more to sacrifice their homes and farms for the new people coming in.”

Mark Brandt of College Grove said many people moved into areas with TVA easements where it was thought that there were no plans to actually use them.

“After 30 years of it being dead, so many people have built houses,” he said. “For them to blaze a trail through the area is an outrage. It’s like we’re not even there.”

TVA will announce its decision on a preferred site and routes for future studies in late spring.

“We are still looking at alternative sites,” said Roger Sparry, TVA’s manager of siting and environmental design transmission line projects. “Community input is very important for TVA. Public comment like we’ve heard today will help us make decisions that will have less impact on the community.”

Posted in Daily News Journal, TVA | Leave a Comment »

The Tennessean-Rutherford, Williamson residents fight TVA substation plan

Posted by bdy73 on May 12, 2006

The Tennessean
Rutherford, Williamson residents fight TVA substation plan
By CLAY CAREY
Staff Writer
Published: Thursday, 05/11/06

About 30 rural Rutherford and Williamson County residents presented a petition to the Tennessee Valley Authority today challenging its efforts to build a major power substation in their communities.

“This isn’t just a bunch of people saying, ‘Hey, we don’t want to look at this,’” said College Grove resident Richard Davis, who helped organize the signature drive. “These people are saying this will destroy their lifestyle.”

TVA is considering four sites in southwest Rutherford County near the Williamson County line for a 500-kilovolt substation, which would encompass about 60 acres, and about 50 new miles of high-voltage power lines. The agency has said rapidly rising demands for energy in the area, especially in Williamson and Rutherford counties, make the new station a necessity. Without it, they say, TVA won’t be able to meet the area’s energy demands by 2010.

The community petition, which was presented to TVA this afternoon at the agency’s Murfreesboro customer service center, included around 1,200 signatures, organizers said. It was circulated in the rural areas around College Grove and Eagleville for about three weeks.

“There’s not a free flow of information,” said Williamson County resident Bryan Young, who was there when TVA received the petition.

He and others in the impacted area have said they knew nothing about TVA’s proposal until, in some cases, they learned the agency was considering land on or around their property for the project.

TVA’s proposals wouldn’t require Young or Davis to sell his property, but both said they know others in the community who would be directly impacted.

“We are not out here to say ‘No TVA, go away.’ … we are out here saying before you use eminent domain to take people’s homes, we want to see that you’ve explored all the other options,’” Davis said.

Specifically, he said, TVA should look at ways to promote conservation of electricity before looking to expand its infrastructure to accommodate rising demand.Published: Thursday, 05/11/06

Posted in TVA, Tennessean | Leave a Comment »

WSMV-Rural Rutherford Co. fights TVA substation

Posted by bdy73 on May 11, 2006

WSMV TV report.

Posted in TVA, WSMV | Leave a Comment »

The Tennessean-TVA not to blame for energy consumption

Posted by bdy73 on May 11, 2006

Letters to the Editor: TVA not to blame for energy consumption
The Tennessean
Published: Thursday, 05/11/06

To the Editor:
The article, “Power plan jolts rural area,” May 6, plus the letter by Stephanie Robbins reflects the disconnect between Americans and the consequences of our lifestyle. (“TVA should look elsewhere for land,” May 10)

While I dislike the idea of a new power station that infringes upon the families and vistas in Rutherford County (or anywhere for that matter), it is important that we ask, “why this solution?” The only answer that makes any sense is to inconvenience the fewest citizens to feed America’s growing energy needs.

It is easy to blame TVA, but the burden rests on the shoulders of every citizen to use less energy. America has only 5 percent of the world’s population, but we use 25 percent of earth’s natural resources. The size of new homes in America keeps going up, meaning it takes more energy to heat, cool and light our houses. Houses are filled with power-hungry electric devices. If we maintain our current lifestyles, then some people’s dreams will get crushed to accommodate society’s appetites.

Our leaders should be asking Americans to sacrifice or (gasp) to take a less convenient path in the name of being responsible. They should promote conservation and stigmatize gluttonous consumption. Show us how not to lust for power, money and energy.

If our leaders had the guts, and individual citizens the self-discipline, this power station might not be a “need.” It is you and I who are crushing dreams, not TVA. I know, I am asking a lot, but only because I believe we can do better.

Alan Powell Nashville 37205
editorialresponse@earthlink.net

Posted in TVA, Tennessean | Leave a Comment »